Comments on: Climategate Summarized

By: Bunk Strutts

Bunk Strutts — Wed, 15 Dec 2010 08:21:42 +0000

Estar– Awash in the Sea of Hoss are we?

By: Estarcatus

Estarcatus — Wed, 15 Dec 2010 01:28:05 +0000

Poppycock! By which I mean: I have caught an unmentionable (in polite company anyway) extremity in the pencil sharpener. Again. Were I not in such dire straits, I might have debunked this unadulterated mass of hog manure in short order.

But, seeing as how my dingle is in perilous dangle, I will merely say: you, sir, are no scientist. Now, to figure out how to remove myself, again, without needing to pick fleshy shavings from the grinding apparatus later.

By: Awesome Arguments « The Awesome Squad

Awesome Arguments « The Awesome Squad — Thu, 14 Oct 2010 06:29:40 +0000

[...] Awesome Analysis. [...]

By: Bunk Strutts

Bunk Strutts — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 06:48:52 +0000

Clima– Thanks for the kudos. Your check is in the mail.

By: ClimateGate2009

ClimateGate2009 — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 06:29:32 +0000

Excellent. Very funny and a good representation of the current state of climate science.

By: Dinosaurs slept with their eyes open. « Tacky Raccoons

Dinosaurs slept with their eyes open. « Tacky Raccoons — Wed, 30 Dec 2009 07:07:34 +0000

[...] here. Related post here.] Possibly related posts: (automatically [...]

By: Bunk Strutts

Bunk Strutts — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 07:03:18 +0000

sHx– No ad hominem attack at all. Just pointing out inadvertant fallacies in your assumptions. One more false accusation from you and I’ll see that your grant funding matches that of the Marionette Historical Preservation Society.

cbullitt– I’ve just transferred the funds from sHx’ MHPS-level account to yours. You owe me a Red Tail Ale. Or two. Keep the change.

By: cbullitt

cbullitt — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 05:08:21 +0000

That’s the best ClimateGate post I’ve read in 2 weeks. Genius.

By: sHx

sHx — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 05:02:03 +0000

Ad hominem now, is it?

You wait! I have just submitted a What Are You Hiding request with the Office of Watts Up With That. As soon as I get the data released, I shall be able to rebut your arguments at length.

Meanwhile, ad, as they say, ios, am-bloody-igo! :)

By: Bunk Strutts

Bunk Strutts — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 03:26:58 +0000

sHx–Boy, if I had a dime for every time I heard that old saw.

Although the Moholy-Nagy Congruent fell into disfavor during the Carter Administration, most of the arguments were dismissed as being without merit during the Portensil Debates of 1987. You’ve surely heard of them. [Source: Schematics in Climatological Polycyanurism, Vol I, pp. 33-54. 1987, Cole University Press.]

Regarding the F&B Conundrum, critic Edmond Muckers was himself discredited and disbarred from climatology research in 1995 for fraud. If you recall, Muckers’ sole claim to fame was the infamous – and since disproven – CO2 “hammer.” Forced to team up with confederate Stuart L. Crooke (not “Crook” as you state) MC Environmental Analysis was awarded over $500,000 in research grants to study the non-existent MC Hammer hypothesis. Both are serving 5 year sentences for fraud, with a court order to pay back the missing grant money plus 20% penalty.

As for Z&E: I agree with you on this one with the caveat that not enough time has passed to answer the assumptions of the McDoguile-Alotoffe Paradigm.

However, after a brief review, I’ll offer this:
In its domain of definition, the time-p map of a scalar, autonomous holomorphic, complex differential equation, is itself holomorphic. This result is used by Sverdlove [1] when considering limit cycles in complex holomorphic differential equations. However no proof or reference for the result is given in [1]. Although this result must be well established, a proof does not appear to be readily accessible in the reference literature.

So, using the chain rule, what is:
frac{d}{dt}\left( \frac{1}{2} \left(\frac{d^2 x}{dt^2} \right)^2 \right) \,\,?
See where I’m going? Let’s set that one aside for a day or so.

(Sorry for the long-winded response, but you had it coming. :)