A long, long time ago this painting made complete sense.
There’s a wood-fired forge, anvils, metal working tools, a peacock, a gryphon(?!) a deer and a bigass possum watching a naked man without genitalia cringe as a woman takes an axe to a parrot while the wind is blowing.
It’s an illustration from a French manuscript entitled The Personification of Nature Making Birds, Animals and People [ca. 1405].
Okay, so Mother Nature had already finished creating The Birds, The Animals and at least one of The People, but then she realized that the poor guy needed a pecker. If anyone else has a better analysis, post it, because I’m done here.
[Image found here.]
so funny – i’ve got nothing…)
LikeLike
ksbeth– Wise response.
LikeLike
From what I read, the woman seems to stand as Mother Nature or something. Not sure what’s supposed to be in her hand but it’s not an ax. She’s at the end of the process of making the bird not chopping its head off. Why she has clothes on and the man doesn’t will only make sense if you’re from the 16th century, and maybe not even then.
LikeLike
Jude– The Getty Museum has this description:
Wiki has an entry for Roman de la Rose, and there’s this description from here:
LikeLike
Thanks for the further info. I’ve wondered how medieval artists thought. Why and how artists from all sorts of other eras thought too. Like Egyptian art where animals were portrayed with amazing accuracy but every person was shown in profile and looked the same – although people were more accurately done in statues. Chinese art depicted birds and most animals well but lions looked weird and most people looked the same. Makes me wonder why.
LikeLike
Jude–
I would guess that a lot of the artists were depicting animals from description by those who had discovered them, and that the latter may have exaggerated a bit. Few ancient cultures had enough leisure time or wealth to support artistry. Egypt was an exception.
What puzzles me is how long it took for artists to figure out how perspective works.
LikeLike
The genitalia are hidden (squeezed) between his legs so as not to offend/distract. 🙂
Read the poem as a child. thanks for the reminder, must re-read.
LikeLike
beauti– Thanks for the clarification, although I can’t imagine a child’s poem that talks about hiding male genitals… 😀
LikeLike